|
|
Post by Irish Stu on Feb 10, 2009 9:09:21 GMT -6
I find the gussets can be a bit chewy.
Simon
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Feb 10, 2009 9:20:20 GMT -6
But they *are* high in fiber.
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stu on Feb 10, 2009 9:25:23 GMT -6
I think there's something fishy about this whole subject.
Simon
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Feb 10, 2009 9:28:09 GMT -6
I find the term "edible panties" redundant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stu on Feb 10, 2009 10:13:16 GMT -6
They're not something to be sniffed at.
Simon
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Feb 10, 2009 10:16:07 GMT -6
I certainly wouldn't cotton to that idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Christinko on Feb 10, 2009 11:15:59 GMT -6
I've received two inquiries on Craig's List for whether I would sell my panties (I'm selling a corset so I guess they think I have panties too?). I guess my $20 base price (postage included!) is too high because they scamper away then. But they would make a lovely base for any cream soup.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Feb 10, 2009 16:57:37 GMT -6
Desmond's cousin Skidmarcus made a few bucks selling his old shorts.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Feb 10, 2009 17:05:49 GMT -6
I don't sell mine. I usually just rent 'em out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Christinko on Feb 10, 2009 18:09:27 GMT -6
I'll swap you my fancy black boxer-briefs underwear for a pair of yours, work out a credit/debit and let me know the details. Mine are used but in excellent condition but still, I'm sure, not as sexy as panties. (and no practical jokes with some 1960's vintage "bloomers"  Gary, I'm confident somewhere in there we can make a swap. You naughty, boy! Doesn't the word "panty" just make you all giggly inside in a titillating, scintillating way? Just getting shivers thinking about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stu on Feb 10, 2009 18:39:56 GMT -6
Doesn't the word "panty" just make you all giggly inside in a titillating, scintillating way? Just getting shivers thinking about it Not as much as the word 'knickers' does  Simon |
|
|
|
Post by Christinko on Feb 10, 2009 20:59:16 GMT -6
Doesn't the word "panty" just make you all giggly inside in a titillating, scintillating way? Just getting shivers thinking about it Not as much as the word 'knickers' does Simon Ah, the cultural differences! Makes me want to quick watch Bridget Jones Diary....sigh! |
|
|
|
Post by edie2u on Feb 10, 2009 23:29:14 GMT -6
Not as much as the word 'knickers' does Simon Ah, the cultural differences! Makes me want to quick watch Bridget Jones Diary....sigh! I was thinking the same thing! |
|
|
|
Post by DT on Feb 11, 2009 8:16:55 GMT -6
Yes, it's true, the word "panty" has a sexiness all it's own. Maybe because it's the final wrap of the sensual parts. And the word "thong" is the sexiest of them all. |
|
|
|
Post by DT on Feb 11, 2009 8:29:27 GMT -6
I see the word "knicker" in the not so sexy "under ware" and "whitey tidy" category.
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stu on Feb 11, 2009 8:36:28 GMT -6
Here knickers has the exact same meaning as panties, so has the same sexiness.
Simon
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawaii Kaiju on Feb 11, 2009 8:47:15 GMT -6
I don't know, I see "panties" as a child word. You know, the underwear you put on the 3 - 5 year old girl. It holds no sexiness for me. "Knickers" has an old fashioned feel to it in my head, like something you would see next to "Bloomers" and "Petticoats". Thongs are a sort of shoe you wear in the summer. None of the words for underwear bottoms seems to elicit any excitement in me.
Zilla (who thinks that is a bit of a shame now that I have realized it)
|
|
|
|
Post by DT on Feb 11, 2009 8:55:25 GMT -6
I don't know, I see "panties" as a child word. You know, the underwear you put on the 3 - 5 year old girl. It holds no sexiness for me. "Knickers" has an old fashioned feel to it in my head, like something you would see next to "Bloomers" and "Petticoats". Thongs are a sort of shoe you wear in the summer. None of the words for underwear bottoms seems to elicit any excitement in me.
Zilla (who thinks that is a bit of a shame now that I have realized it) Will G-String spark some excitement. psssst.....It does in me. |
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stu on Feb 11, 2009 9:00:34 GMT -6
G-string is sexier. I've never thought that thong is a sexy word.
Simon
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Feb 11, 2009 10:52:30 GMT -6
Doesn't the word "panty" just make you all giggly inside in a titillating, scintillating way? Just getting shivers thinking about it Can we please try to avoid the racial slurs? |
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Feb 11, 2009 10:59:07 GMT -6
Here, knickers are old fashioned knee pants. The last person I saw wearing them was antique golfer Gene Sarazen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tex on Feb 11, 2009 18:19:43 GMT -6
For casual interest I tried to find the ingredients and calorie content of edible panties, I couldn't find them. Do you think it would be insulting to floss immediately after eating them off your lover, just curious. It varies with yeast content. |
|
|
|
Post by Christinko on Feb 11, 2009 21:20:00 GMT -6
G-string is sexier. I've never thought that thong is a sexy word. Simon There's always "snatch patch." Just remembered: I have a friend who's coming to my wedding this summer....he has a panty fetish to the nth degree and I always make sure I wore panties around him just in case he get a peek because panties bring him such pleasure. He was SO upset many years ago when JCPenney stopped selling its big granny silky panties, but when they came back the next year he bought a gross of them (yes, 144 pairs) for his wife. She wears them to bed each night so he can unwrap the package every morning. I just giggle with delight when I think of their naughty little habits. |
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Feb 11, 2009 21:38:23 GMT -6
For casual interest I tried to find the ingredients and calorie content of edible panties, I couldn't find them. Do you think it would be insulting to floss immediately after eating them off your lover, just curious. Well, of course, if they're thongs, then by definition, they already ARE butt floss. |
|
