|
Post by DT on Jan 12, 2005 12:40:54 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 12, 2005 12:55:12 GMT -6
Win some lose some......................... Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Hedo69 on Jan 12, 2005 14:18:45 GMT -6
If only they had kept it up. The WMD's would have been under the next rock. I am just sure of it!
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 12, 2005 14:27:36 GMT -6
Damn....even OJ is still looking for Nichole's killer...
|
|
|
Post by Exildo Wonsetler Briggs III on Jan 12, 2005 17:45:07 GMT -6
I would like to ask Saddam why, if he had none, did he not let the UN do their job without impeading their progress? I would also like to search those trucks that mysteriously left Iraq for Syria just before the war started! ..........Bob
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Jake on Jan 12, 2005 17:51:33 GMT -6
Didn't they ALREADY find WMDs? A bunch of chemical weapon warheads? That would count. But of course the "libruls" conveniently discard that fact because it disagrees with their prior assumptions.....Jake
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 12, 2005 18:16:56 GMT -6
Uh, I thought Bush said we went to war cause were under imminent threat of the WMD. Explain how what was found translated into that? It ain't just the liberals expressing dismay at the lack of evidence to justify the beginning of the war...
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Jake on Jan 12, 2005 19:09:01 GMT -6
First you want WMDs. So they find WMDs. NOW you say you want to see the "imminent threat". What next? The broomstick of the Wicked Witch of the West? The libs will NEVER be satisfied. Their game plan is to bitch, bitch, bitch about any conservative administration and their policies, no matter how appropriate......Jake
|
|
|
Post by Exildo Wonsetler Briggs III on Jan 12, 2005 20:02:13 GMT -6
It ain't just the liberals expressing dismay at the lack of evidence to justify the beginning of the war... Oh for CRYING OUT LOUD!!! Won't you guys get over it?? Even the GOD CLINTON signed the bill saying regime ch-ch-change in Iraq was official USA policy! Lemme see....which kid missed the fieldgoal this past weekend, and the other team won in sudden death?? THE STUPID SHIT should have made it!! WHAT AN IDIOT!! Geez......won't you Lib'ruls get over it Iraq and WMDs? Aww..forget the WMDs. Let's see....any Lib'rul out there now think Osama has no interest in Iraq?? REALLY??? And OBTW, how much of the current problem in Iraq do you suppose is due to SYRIA and IRAN sending money and weapons to KILL innocents??? I say it's about time to send those folks a message!! ................Bob
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 12, 2005 22:51:01 GMT -6
We have orchestrated regime ch-ch-change without entering into a full blown war before. That was NOT the only solution and there was nothing about the timing that was right. Have you talked to anybody serving in Afghanistan at the time say several months prior to the start of the Iraqi war? Think what you wish butt the job hasn't been half done in Afghanistan.
But [glow=red,2,300]BUSH FULL THROTTLE![/glow] Let's keep on keeping on. We still have Syria, Iran and North Korea in need of regime ch-ch-change by all qualification of the Bush regime ch-ch-change doctrine....what fuck are we waiting on? More armored humvees? Hadn't stopped us in Iraq.
Rumsfeld says it ain't cause of money, but rather, "physics"...only so much production happen....funny how the producers say they are filling all orders with capacity left over, just as an example....
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Jake on Jan 12, 2005 23:34:06 GMT -6
...We still have Syria, Iran and North Korea in need of regime ch-ch-change by all qualification of the Bush regime ch-ch-change doctrine....what fuck are we waiting on? are filling all orders with capacity left over, just as an example.... They haven't invaded their neighbors yet.....Jake
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 13, 2005 9:30:39 GMT -6
I forgot...who was Iraq invading when we attack it?
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 13, 2005 10:10:11 GMT -6
We have orchestrated regime ch-ch-change without entering into a full blown war before. .... Won't of made any difference to the Liberals if the CIA would of went in there and blew Saddam's head off. You guys still would have bitched because we assassinated his ass. Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Hedo69 on Jan 13, 2005 10:20:32 GMT -6
Not this liberal. I think a well placed bullet to the head would have made this whole process a bit less painful. Or 3 if necessary to get the two sons too.
3 deaths compared to thousands? Hmmmmmm how is there any question?
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 13, 2005 10:26:20 GMT -6
Not this liberal. I think a well placed bullet to the head would have made this whole process a bit less painful. Or 3 if necessary to get the two sons too. 3 deaths compared to thousands? Hmmmmmm how is there any question? Deborah you are on of the sane liberals who use common since, a vast majority of them don't. The are not sane either. You couldn't satisfy some of them if you hung them with a new rope. I would like to try. Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 13, 2005 10:49:45 GMT -6
Huge ASSumption in your part.
Even before the war, I was saying there was no need for it...just a well prepared special ops team....less costly, highly effective and none of our blood.
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 13, 2005 10:55:17 GMT -6
Huge ASSumption in your part. Could be HB, and it wouldn't be the first time I did it. ;D I'll put you in the same category as Deborah, butt there are lots of your buddies out there that don't think the same way. Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 13, 2005 11:53:06 GMT -6
Maybe we could not have blown his head off!!!!!!
Didn't one of our Presidents sign some kind of law that states we can not assassinate the leader of another country or something? Ford or Carter maybe? I could be all wet behind the ears on this one.
Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 13, 2005 13:00:42 GMT -6
Didn't Reagan, Bush or Clinton rescind that executive order?
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 13, 2005 14:52:14 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 13, 2005 21:26:34 GMT -6
Didn't Reagan, Bush or Clinton rescind that executive order? To the best of my knowledge. NO Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 13, 2005 21:47:38 GMT -6
Dagnabit, sumbunny presidential did....cause I remember thinking about how that opened us up to similar retribution... /me edited to addThis must be what I'm is thinking of...[shadow=red,left,300]Executive Order 12333[/shadow]. Originally issued by Ford and then redefined by Reagan www.ksg.harvard.edu/cchrp/Use%20of%20Force/October%202002/Parks_final.pdfApparantly it wasn't "rescinded", rather, it was redefined
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 14, 2005 0:00:23 GMT -6
But it is still in effect?
Joe.
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 14, 2005 7:38:01 GMT -6
Yes, it is from what I can find.....just with different definitions from when Ford issued it. BTW, it never does define what is an assassination...
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 14, 2005 19:52:40 GMT -6
BTW, it never does define what is an assassination... Assassination has only one definition. But according to the executive order it would have been illegal if we shot him in the head. We wouldn't have want the President to order anything illegal know would we? Joe. Joe
|
|
|
Post by Harrybutt on Jan 14, 2005 21:36:35 GMT -6
Didn't help Tricky Dick much...
|
|
|
Post by Merlot Joe on Jan 14, 2005 23:29:38 GMT -6
No it didn't.
Joe.
|
|