|
|
Post by Chicago Jake on Sept 18, 2009 0:23:40 GMT -6
Thanks to a brilliant suggestion by Simon, we now have a dedicated sub-board for posting of photographic creations. If you took a photo that you want to share, or finessed a Photoshop project that you are particularly proud of, or have any other sort of 2-D artistic masterpiece that you want to propagate, post it here! I made this a sub-board, rather than a full board, because our main page is already a lot longer than it should be, and I didn't want it to get any more unwieldy than it already is. But please don't take that as a slight; I have loved photography for a long, long time, and consider this a very worthwhile board. So please enjoy it as a fully-endorsed forum of the TNMC (or whatever it's branded as these days).As you can see, I moved it to be a full-fledged board, despite my misgivings about making the front page unwieldy. We'll just have to see how it goes!I gave it a temporary name (Shutterbug Chalet) just as a place-holder. I'm not sure I like it. Not nearly naughty enough, or at least laden with some sly sexual innuendo (like "Between the Covers" or "Cook Teasers," heh heh). It is easy to ch-ch-change. So, if you have suggestions for a better forum title, lemme know! That might even be worth its own thread. (I have lots of sub-par ideas of my own, but am more interested in other peoples' ideas. My random thoughts off the top of my head: Pixel Palace, F-Stop Fitzgerald's, Aperture Alley, Lensman's Lair, Girls On Film, Image-Inarium, even "Photo Phorum", and ad nauseum....) Clearly, my name didn't stand. But I like the new one a lot.Also - let's talk about Simon's idea of a periodic contest on a photographic theme. How can we implement that? Anyway, it's time to post away! I'm looking forward to all of your images......Jake  |
|
|
|
Post by innit Geezer on Sept 18, 2009 5:35:16 GMT -6
Glad to see you're not eating those oil saturated things and are only using them as props.
Today I will take a picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Sept 18, 2009 11:47:53 GMT -6
I gave it a temporary name (Shutterbug Chalet) just as a place-holder. I'm not sure I like it. Not nearly naughty enough, or at least laden with some sly sexual innuendo (like "Between the Covers" or "Cook Teasers," heh heh). It is easy to ch-ch-change. So, if you have suggestions for a better forum title, lemme know! That might even be worth its own thread. Howzabout "Over Exposed" or "Expose Yourself" or "Double Exposure" or some variation on that idea? |
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Jake on Sept 18, 2009 12:30:07 GMT -6
Not bad!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ardbeg... innit on Sept 18, 2009 12:31:58 GMT -6
To paraphrase Oliver Hardy.. "That's another fine pixel you've gotten us into"
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Jake on Sept 18, 2009 13:58:56 GMT -6
How about "Kissing the Pixel"?
|
|
|
|
Post by New Mama on Sept 18, 2009 14:11:19 GMT -6
I like 'expose yourself'. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Hedo69 on Sept 18, 2009 14:35:54 GMT -6
Great idea! You guys might regret it though - Since I bought my DSLR last Dec, I've taken almost 10,000 pics with it and that doesn't even touch the ones I already had in my photo archive.
Will be fun and I look forward to seeing what you guys have to share.
Deb
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Sept 18, 2009 16:21:01 GMT -6
Also to keep in mind: If you want to save yourself a couple of mouse clicks, you can set the Sub-Board to display as part of the main Generally Speaking Board by modifying your profile as such ...
| Expand Sub-Boards: No/Yes | If you wish to have all sub-board's posts display in the parent board, select "Yes." |
If you put this setting to "Yes", then my understanding about how this works is that you won't have to click into the Sub-Board to see posts in that forum -- I believe they will just appear as though it is part of Generally Speaking (a feature you may or may not want to have ... your mileage may vary ... ) -- Hedo DiveMaster Bukkake |
|
|
|
Post by Ardbeg... innit on Sept 18, 2009 19:08:35 GMT -6
Regrettable way to start a weekend, terribly informative, concise, and in general, helpful ... Red Card
|
|
|
|
Post by innit Geezer on Sept 19, 2009 10:20:34 GMT -6
Also to keep in mind: If you want to save yourself a couple of mouse clicks, you can set the Sub-Board to display as part of the main Generally Speaking Board by modifying your profile as such ...
| Expand Sub-Boards: No/Yes | If you wish to have all sub-board's posts display in the parent board, select "Yes." |
If you put this setting to "Yes", then my understanding about how this works is that you won't have to click into the Sub-Board to see posts in that forum -- I believe they will just appear as though it is part of Generally Speaking (a feature you may or may not want to have ... your mileage may vary ... ) -- Hedo DiveMaster Bukkake This didn't work for me, have you tried it? |
|
|
|
Post by Ardbeg... innit on Sept 19, 2009 10:36:33 GMT -6
Oh oh.. there is a red flag on the field now.. Gary is calling for a review of the play. If the decision that information intended to be helpful turned out to be bogus holds, it could mean a SECOND RED CARD for Beeb
|
|
|
|
Post by ♥ COVID-19♥ on Sept 21, 2009 8:36:38 GMT -6
Also to keep in mind: If you want to save yourself a couple of mouse clicks, you can set the Sub-Board to display as part of the main Generally Speaking Board by modifying your profile as such ...
| Expand Sub-Boards: No/Yes | If you wish to have all sub-board's posts display in the parent board, select "Yes." |
If you put this setting to "Yes", then my understanding about how this works is that you won't have to click into the Sub-Board to see posts in that forum -- I believe they will just appear as though it is part of Generally Speaking (a feature you may or may not want to have ... your mileage may vary ... ) -- Hedo DiveMaster Bukkake This didn't work for me, have you tried it? Yes, I tried it and yes, it's working for me. What browser/version are you using? I've tried it in IE7 but haven't yet had a chance to look at it in Firefox. I've noticed that sometimes, some of the features ProBoards adds can be somewhat version specific (at least at first). |
|
